Pulse Diagnosis in Chinese Medicine – Starting A Modern Scientific Method

Chinese Medicine is as much an art as it is a science. One of the strongest values of Chinese Medicine is how a practitioner can look deeply into each patient and find the causal factors driving their illnesses and tailor a treatment directly to them. There is an intuitive part to this, an artistic part and a scientific part – all of which are fostered by training and clinical experiences.

To uncover and ultimately treat these underlying diagnostic “patterns” the Chinese Medicine practitioner utilizes many diagnostic tools. The most common ones are described within the “examinations and diagnosis” section on our theory site.

Of these tongue diagnosis and pulse diagnosis are arguably the most important and most clinically valid. Tongue diagnosis has the benefit, in my opinion, of being far less subjective – in other words more practitioners will see the same things on the tongue in the same way when compared with how they might come to different conclusions with the pulse. The pulse, however, will show a wider range of imbalances and can be extremely useful in deciphering the root of mixed patterns.

In pulse diagnosis you are looking for certain qualities of the pulse (not just rate as most would assume). So terms such as “slippery”, “wiry”, etc. are used in conjunction with certain pulse positions. There are a few alternate pulse positions to check on the wrist and then others elsewhere on the body. A common positional understanding includes 3 positions on each wrist along the radial artery starting behind the wrist crease. On the left wrist closest to the crease you see relationships with the heart system, the liver behind that and the kidney behind that and on the right wrist you have the lung system at the crease, the spleen system behind that and the mingmen behind that.

Left Wrist Right Wrist
Cun (inch) - 1st position HT / SI LU / LI
Guan (barr) - 2nd position LV / GB SP / ST
Chi (foot) - 3rd position KD / UB Mingmen / Lower Burner

A basic diagnostic example might be as follows: For someone that we might reference as “stressed out” in the west – they might have what we call “liver qi stagnation” in Chinese Medicine. We wouldn’t, however, just assume they have this diagnosis because they describe being “stressed out” (see “treating the cause and not the symptoms” for more on this) – we would come to this conclusion from using all of the diagnostic tools referenced above. Their tongue might be purple which can indicate “stagnation”
particularly on the sides which is the “liver” area on the tongue, and their pulse might be “wiry” – particularly in the 2nd left wrist position which correlates with the liver system. That, of course, is a very simplified example.

Now one of the problems with pulse diagnosis as I hinted at above is that it can be quite subjective once you get beyond the more simple cases. You could line up 50 tcm doctors and have them all look at the tongue and pulse and with the tongue you would (just guessing here) get probably 40 out of 50 in agreement with only mild nuances differing, but with the pulse you might get 10 out of 50 – partially because it is offering more information admittedly and there are different systems of correlations. But, in my experience and opinion, it would be different (an interesting study to perform for those researchers that might be reading this).

To compensate for this arguable lack of precision a group of researchers from Taiwan recently conducted a study looking at more scientifically measurable pulse variations and trying to group them into diagnostic categories. Involving researchers from the division of cardiology at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and the Institute of Traditional Medicine at National Yang-Ming University among others they aimed to correlate a range of pulse wave parameters and heart rate variability with standard TCM diagnoses.

To perform the study they recruited 69 relatively healthy volunteers and utilized a wrist blood pressure cuff called “ANSWatch” and obtained pulse readings at the left guan position (the liver area). Utilizing a range of measurements including blood pressure, augmentation index and subendocardial viability index they tried correlating these to each volunteers diagnosis in Chinese Medicine terms.

The researchers found:

  • Those with qi deficiency had higher augmentation index scores and lower diastolic blood pressure.
  • This with yang deficiency had lower systolic blood pressure, lower pulse pressure and lower dP/dt max (a measure of ventricular contraction strength).
  • This with damp-heat had higher subendocardial viability index scores.

Now there are a million caveats with a study of this nature all indicating that there is much more research to be done before this would lead to clinically valid ways of obtaining or helping to confirm diagnoses in Chinese Medicine. But this is a nice approach to using modern western diagnostic tools with time proven traditional medicine tools. Particularly since proper diagnosis is so crucial within Chinese Medicine to obtain the best clinical outcomes.

Community :: Want To Discuss This Post?

Notable Replies

  1. The correlations with Western medical practice are good, but note that Western medicine generally uses Newtonian physics, certainly not quantum- and quantum is over 100 years old now! This truly matters if you consider how torsion, a subtle energy from a “higher” domain than physical that has been researched by Kozarev and others affects the pulses! Often called the “zero point fiend”, there are already medical devices that utilize it. This energy may be the “carrier” for higher domains of knowing, as well: my understanding is that as the practitioner reads the pulses he enters into an entrainment with the client, which enables subtle energetic effects (such as torsion) to be cognized and interpreted. (see “the Bond” by Lynne McTaggart). As Western medicine opens to the much more advanced ideas in physics that are not taught in regular schools (unless you are in Russia or Eastern Europe, where they are), a greater fluency with these concepts will propel their usage into common parlance, and help to establish a common vocabulary, which will be key in integrating East and West.

  2. I can understand your point of view. But it would be helpful if you could describe a direct clinical example relevant to pulse diagnosis in acupuncture theory where your understanding of subtle/quantum energy would make someone choose a more closely aligned diagnosis in Chinese Medicine terms for their patients than what the current practices offer - or even than what the research article was discussing. In other words, direct your comment towards clinical examples relevant to the article.

    While the bulk of theories surrounding the idea of the torsion field that you are describing have been disproven by many ( 1 ). There is certainly merit and correlation in the general idea that “we” are much larger than “ourselves” and that in essence neither of those exist. Certainly some concepts of this is what form part of our tong ren therapy energy healing system and Chinese Medicine being interwoven with meditation, tai chi, bagua, Taoism generally, etc. - is certainly no stranger to these general ideas.

    At the end of the day, however, we are here and as practitioners we have patients with problems that cause them to suffer. To me, when patient is coming for me to help, I’m concerned with what tools allow me to help them the most efficiently, directly and reliably.

    The beginnings of what you are alluding to are present in works such as:
    Vibrational Medicine: The 1 Handbook of Subtle-Energy Therapies
    Tachyon Energy: A New Paradigm in Holistic Healing

    as examples.

    While I’m certainly not arguing against these much larger ideas, in fact use them in various ways already, but I also need to make sure they are clinically relevant - that they can help me, efficiently and reliably, to remove the suffering my patients experience. That is what drives my interest.

    If you can present those ideas in a way that is clinically relevant to the readers of this site (i.e. Chinese Medicine), I would be very happy to hear more about your views.

  3. Fab says:

    In my humble opinion, Chinese modern day practitioners have lost their traditional art, everyone is searching for western medicine types of “proof”. But that leads to a simplification of traditional Chinese medicine, with many practitioners simply not mastering their art and trying to mix it with western medicine…
    Remember also that TCM is as much a modern era creation as it is supposed to be the collection of traditional, ancient, medical practice. It was set up by modern day communist china in an effort to standardise the tradition and make it more simpler…

    People say pulse reading is so subjective, but that is maybe simply because pulse reading is such an elaborate and precious tool that it needs a long practice before mastering.
    I think that everyone who feels a “soggy” pulse or a “hidden” pulse should be able to recognize it. Of course, pulse varies a lot during the day, but this is because it reflects the immediate energy balance of the body and mind. The pulse is the perfect reflection of energetic information at a given moment.
    Another aspect of pulse reading is that different practitioners do not really get different information from it but in fact focus on a different information, and that is a GOOD thing, each SHOULD treat the patient in a different way, that is what makes the richness and diversity of an Art.
    Starting to standardise things and come up with protocols is a failure, it is the end of an Art and the beginning of materialistic, poor, and uniform science. Art is superior to science and does not indulge in protocols. That is exactly why westerners are now try out alternative medicine, simply to flee from the inhuman, standardized, uniformed protocols of western medicine… It s a shame that TCM is now using the same philosophy as modern occidental medicine : forgetting to treat the patient with his personal history and focusing on the illness… Well in reality, “modern” TCM does exactly the same thing with its “syndromes diagnosis”… Healing is about helping the patient to “recover” from the traumas of his personal history and life, not about using standardized protocols to fix syndromes and symptoms…
    For example, in acupuncture, you should never do the same treatment twice, even on the same patient…

    Reality is that Chinese practitioners are so fascinated by modern western medicine that they now tend to use a modern, materialistic approach, forgetting the complex taoist and, esoteric and astronomical bases of their art.

    That happens when you forget your roots.
    It is also clearly the goal of communism to give a materialistic, atheist, and simplified basis to Chinese medicine, because communism just wants to select some parts of the rich history of acupuncture and herbology, that does comply with its materialistic vision of the world, while “purging” and destroying the most authentic and traditional aspects of them.

Community :: Want To Discuss This Post?